Private accounts risky? Not for some.
Here's a great article from today's Opinion Journal about who's opposed to Social Security reform: Socialism's Last Redoubt. What's funny is that they have their investments in the exact same accounts that we'd be able to place our 4% in and have it grow. So apparently these accounts are too risky for most but not for the power players in D.C. and their employees.
I guess what's good for the goose isn't good for the gander in their opinion, the gander being the taxpayers that continue to elect these fine folks into office and pay taxes to fund their pork projects. The 2006 cycle is only 1-1/2 years away, and some of these same people might find themselves unemployed if they don't start being more responsive to the needs and desires of their constituencies.
I guess what's good for the goose isn't good for the gander in their opinion, the gander being the taxpayers that continue to elect these fine folks into office and pay taxes to fund their pork projects. The 2006 cycle is only 1-1/2 years away, and some of these same people might find themselves unemployed if they don't start being more responsive to the needs and desires of their constituencies.


<< Home